GLM¶

Introduction¶

Generalized Linear Models (GLM) estimate regression models for outcomes following exponential distributions. In addition to the Gaussian (i.e. normal) distribution, these include Poisson, binomial, and gamma distributions. Each serves a different purpose, and depending on distribution and link function choice, can be used either for prediction or classification.

The GLM suite includes:

• Gaussian regression
• Poisson regression
• Binomial regression (classification)
• Multinomial classification
• Gamma regression

Defining a GLM Model¶

• model_id: (Optional) Specify a custom name for the model to use as a reference. By default, H2O automatically generates a destination key.

• training_frame: (Required) Specify the dataset used to build the model. NOTE: In Flow, if you click the Build a model button from the Parse cell, the training frame is entered automatically.

• validation_frame: (Optional) Specify the dataset used to evaluate the accuracy of the model.

• nfolds: Specify the number of folds for cross-validation.

• response_column: (Required) Specify the column to use as the independent variable.

  • For a regression model, this column must be numeric (Real or Int).
  • For a classification model, this column must be categorical (Enum or String). If the family is Binomial, the dataset cannot contain more than two levels.

• ignored_columns: (Optional) Specify the column or columns to be excluded from the model. In Flow, click the checkbox next to a column name to add it to the list of columns excluded from the model. To add all columns, click the All button. To remove a column from the list of ignored columns, click the X next to the column name. To remove all columns from the list of ignored columns, click the None button. To search for a specific column, type the column name in the Search field above the column list. To only show columns with a specific percentage of missing values, specify the percentage in the Only show columns with more than 0% missing values field. To change the selections for the hidden columns, use the Select Visible or Deselect Visible buttons.

• ignore_const_cols: Enable this option to ignore constant training columns, since no information can be gained from them. This option is enabled by default.

• family: Specify the model type.

  • If the family is gaussian, the data must be numeric (Real or Int).
  • If the family is binomial, the data must be categorical 2 levels/classes or binary (Enum or Int).
  • If the family is multinomial, the data can be categorical with more than two levels/classes (Enum).
  • If the family is poisson, the data must be numeric and non-negative (Int).
  • If the family is gamma, the data must be numeric and continuous and positive (Real or Int).
  • If the family is tweedie, the data must be numeric and continuous (Real) and non-negative.

• tweedie_variance_power: (Only applicable if Tweedie is specified for Family) Specify the Tweedie variance power.

• tweedie_link_power: (Only applicable if Tweedie is specified for Family) Specify the Tweedie link power.

• solver: Specify the solver to use (AUTO, IRLSM, L_BFGS, COORDINATE_DESCENT_NAIVE, or COORDINATE_DESCENT). IRLSM is fast on on problems with a small number of predictors and for lambda-search with L1 penalty, while L_BFGS scales better for datasets with many columns. COORDINATE_DESCENT is IRLSM with the covariance updates version of cyclical coordinate descent in the innermost loop. COORDINATE_DESCENT_NAIVE is IRLSM with the naive updates version of cyclical coordinate descent in the innermost loop. COORDINATE_DESCENT_NAIVE and COORDINATE_DESCENT are currently experimental.

• alpha: Specify the regularization distribution between L2 and L2.

• lambda: Specify the regularization strength.

• lambda_search: Specify whether to enable lambda search, starting with lambda max. The given lambda is then interpreted as lambda min.

• nlambdas: (Applicable only if lambda_search is enabled) Specify the number of lambdas to use in the search. The default is 100.

• standardize: Specify whether to standardize the numeric columns to have a mean of zero and unit variance. Standardization is highly recommended; if you do not use standardization, the results can include components that are dominated by variables that appear to have larger variances relative to other attributes as a matter of scale, rather than true contribution. This option is enabled by default.

• remove_collinear_columns: Specify whether to automatically remove collinear columns during model-building. When enabled, collinear columns will be dropped from the model and will have 0 coefficient in the returned model. This can only be set if there is no regularization (lambda=0).

• compute_p_values: Request computation of p-values. Only applicable with no penalty (lambda = 0 and no beta constraints). Setting remove_collinear_columns is recommended. H2O will return an error if p-values are requested and there are collinear columns and remove_collinear_columns flag is not enabled.

• non-negative: Specify whether to force coefficients to have non-negative values.

• beta_constraints: Specify a dataset to use beta constraints. The selected frame is used to constraint the coefficient vector to provide upper and lower bounds. The dataset must contain a names column with valid coefficient names.

• fold_assignment: (Applicable only if a value for nfolds is specified and fold_column is not specified) Specify the cross-validation fold assignment scheme. The available options are AUTO (which is Random), Random, Modulo, or Stratified (which will stratify the folds based on the response variable for classification problems).

• fold_column: Specify the column that contains the cross-validation fold index assignment per observation.

• score_each_iteration: (Optional) Enable this option to score during each iteration of the model training.

• offset_column: Specify a column to use as the offset; the value cannot be the same as the value for the weights_column.

  Note: Offsets are per-row “bias values” that are used during model training. For Gaussian distributions, they can be seen as simple corrections to the response (y) column. Instead of learning to predict the response (y-row), the model learns to predict the (row) offset of the response column. For other distributions, the offset corrections are applied in the linearized space before applying the inverse link function to get the actual response values. For more information, refer to the following link.

• weights_column: Specify a column to use for the observation weights, which are used for bias correction. The specified weights_column must be included in the specified training_frame. Python only: To use a weights column when passing an H2OFrame to x instead of a list of column names, the specified training_frame must contain the specified weights_column.

  Note: Weights are per-row observation weights and do not increase the size of the data frame. This is typically the number of times a row is repeated, but non-integer values are supported as well. During training, rows with higher weights matter more, due to the larger loss function pre-factor.

• max_iterations: Specify the number of training iterations.

• link: Specify a link function (Identity, Family_Default, Logit, Log, Inverse, or Tweedie).

  • If the family is Gaussian, Identity, Log, and Inverse are supported.
  • If the family is Binomial, Logit is supported.
  • If the family is Poisson, Log and Identity are supported.
  • If the family is Gamma, Inverse, Log, and Identity are supported.
  • If the family is Tweedie, only Tweedie is supported.

• max_confusion_matrix_size: Specify the maximum size (number of classes) for the confusion matrices printed in the logs.

• max_hit_ratio_k: (Applicable for classification only) Specify the maximum number (top K) of predictions to use for hit ratio computation. Applicable to multi-class only. To disable, enter 0.

• missing_values_handling: Specify how to handle missing values (Skip or MeanImputation).

• keep_cross_validation_predictions: Specify whether to keep the cross-validation predictions.

• intercept: Specify whether to include a constant term in the model. This option is enabled by default.

• objective_epsilon: Specify a threshold for convergence. If the objective value is less than this threshold, the model is converged.

• beta_epsilon: Specify the beta epsilon value. If the L1 normalization of the current beta change is below this threshold, consider using convergence.

• gradient_epsilon: (For L-BFGS only) Specify a threshold for convergence. If the objective value (using the L-infinity norm) is less than this threshold, the model is converged.

• prior: Specify prior probability for p(y==1). Use this parameter for logistic regression if the data has been sampled and the mean of response does not reflect reality.

  Note: This is a simple method affecting only the intercept. You may want to use weights and offset for a better fit.

• lambda_min_ratio: Specify the minimum lambda to use for lambda search (specified as a ratio of lambda_max).

• max_active_predictors: Specify the maximum number of active predictors during computation. This value is used as a stopping criterium to prevent expensive model building with many predictors.

• seed: Specify the random number generator (RNG) seed for algorithm components dependent on randomization. The seed is consistent for each H2O instance so that you can create models with the same starting conditions in alternative configurations.

Interpreting a GLM Model¶

By default, the following output displays:

• A graph of the normalized coefficient magnitudes
• Output (model category, model summary, scoring history, training metrics, validation metrics, best lambda, threshold, residual deviance, null deviance, residual degrees of freedom, null degrees of freedom, AIC, AUC, binomial, rank)
• Coefficients
• Coefficient magnitudes

Handling of Categorical Variables¶

GLM auto-expands categorical variables into one-hot encoded binary variables (i.e. if variable has levels “cat”,”dog”, “mouse”, cat is encoded as 1,0,0, mouse is 0,1,0 and dog is 0,0,1). It is generally more efficient to let GLM perform auto-expansion instead of expanding data manually and it also adds the benefit of correct handling of different categorical mappings between different datasets as welll as handling of unseen categorical levels. Unlike binary numeric columns, auto-expanded variables are not standardized.

It is common to skip one of the levels during the one-hot encoding to prevent linear dependency between the variable and the intercept. H3O follows the convention of skipping the first level. This behavior can be controlled by setting use_all_factor_levels_flag (no level is going to be skipped if the flag is true). The default depends on regularization parameter - it is set to false if no regularization and to true otherwise. The reference level which is skipped is always the first level, you can change which level is the reference level by calling h2o.relevel function prior to building the model.

Lambda Search and Full Regularization Path¶

If the lambda_search option is set, GLM will compute models for full regularization path similar to glmnet (see glmnet paper). Regularziation path starts at lambda max (highest lambda values which makes sense - i.e. lowest value driving all coefficients to zero) and goes down to lambda min on log scale, decreasing regularization strength at each step. The returned model will have coefficients corresponding to the “optimal” lambda value as decided during training.

It can sometimes be useful to see the coefficients for all lambda values. Or to override default lambda selection. Full regularization path can be extracted from both R and python clients (currently not from Flow). It returns coefficients (and standardized coefficients) for all computed lambda values and also explained deviances on both train and validation. Subsequently, makeGLMModel call can be used to create h2o glm model with selected coefficients.

To extract the regularization path from R or python:

• R: call h2o.getGLMFullRegularizationPath, takes the model as an argument
• Python: H2OGeneralizedLinearEstimator.getGLMRegularizationPath (static method), takes the model as an rgument

Modifying or Creating Custom GLM Model¶

In R and python, makeGLMModel call can be used to create h2o model from given coefficients. It needs a source glm model trained on the same dataset to extract dataset information. To make custom GLM model from R or python:

• R: call h2o.makeGLMModel, takes a model and a vector of coefficients and (optional) decision threshold as parameters.
• Pyton: H2OGeneralizedLinearEstimator.makeGLMModel (static method), takes a model, dictionary containing coefficients and (optional) decision threshold as parameters.

FAQ¶

• How does the algorithm handle missing values during training?

Depending on the selected missing value handling policy, they are either imputed mean or the whole row is skipped. The default behavior is mean imputation. Note that categorical variables are imputed by adding extra “missing” level. Optionally, glm can skip all rows with any missing values.

• How does the algorithm handle missing values during testing?

Same as during training. If the missing value handling is set to skip and we are generating predictions, skipped rows will have Na (missing) prediction.

• What happens if the response has missing values?

The rows with missing response are ignored during model training and validation.

• What happens during prediction if the new sample has categorical levels not seen in training?

The value will be filled with either 0 or a special missing level (if trained with missing values, and missing\_value\_handling was set to MeanImputation).

• Does it matter if the data is sorted?

No.

• Should data be shuffled before training?

No.

• How does the algorithm handle highly imbalanced data in a response column?

GLM does not require special handling for imbalanced data.

• What if there are a large number of columns?

IRLS will get quadratically slower with the number of columns. Try L-BFGS for datasets with more than 5-10 thousand columns.

• What if there are a large number of categorical factor levels?

GLM internally one-hot encodes the categorical factor levels; the same limitations as with a high column count will apply.

• When building the model, does GLM use all features or a selection of the best features?

Typically, GLM picks the best predictors, especially if lasso is used (alpha = 1). By default, the GLM model includes an L1 penalty and will pick only the most predictive predictors.

• When running GLM, is it better to create a cluster that uses many smaller nodes or fewer larger nodes?

A rough heuristic would be:

\(nodes ~=M *N^2/(p * 1e8)\)

where \(M\) is the number of observations, \(N\) is the number of columns (categorical columns count as a single column in this case), and \(p\) is the number of CPU cores per node.

For example, a dataset with 250 columns and 1M rows would optimally use about 20 nodes with 32 cores each (following the formula \(250^2 *1000000/(32* 1e8) = 19.5 ~= 20)\).

• How is variable importance calculated for GLM?

For GLM, the variable importance represents the coefficient magnitudes.

GLM Algorithm¶

Following the definitive text by P. McCullagh and J.A. Nelder (1989) on the generalization of linear models to non-linear distributions of the response variable Y, H2O fits GLM models based on the maximum likelihood estimation via iteratively reweighed least squares.

Let \(y_{1},…,y_{n}\) be n observations of the independent, random response variable \(Y_{i}\).

Assume that the observations are distributed according to a function from the exponential family and have a probability density function of the form:

\(f(y_{i})=exp[\frac{y_{i}\theta_{i} - b(\theta_{i})}{a_{i}(\phi)} + c(y_{i}; \phi)]\) where \(\theta\) and \(\phi\) are location and scale parameters, and \(a_{i}(\phi)\), \(b_{i}(\theta{i})\), and \(c_{i}(y_{i}; \phi)\) are known functions.

\(a_{i}\) is of the form \(a_{i}= \frac{\phi}{p_{i}}\) where \(p_{i}\) is a known prior weight.

When \(Y\) has a pdf from the exponential family:

\(E(Y_{i})=\mu_{i}=b^{\prime} var(Y_{i})=\sigma_{i}^2=b^{\prime\prime}(\theta_{i})a_{i}(\phi)\)

Let \(g(\mu_{i})=\eta_{i}\) be a monotonic, differentiable transformation of the expected value of \(y_{i}\). The function \(\eta_{i}\) is the link function and follows a linear model.

\(g(\mu_{i})=\eta_{i}=\mathbf{x_{i}^{\prime}}\beta\)

When inverted: \(\mu=g^{-1}(\mathbf{x_{i}^{\prime}}\beta)\)

Maximum Likelihood Estimation

For an initial rough estimate of the parameters \(\hat{\beta}\), use the estimate to generate fitted values: \(\mu_{i}=g^{-1}(\hat{\eta_{i}})\)

Let \(z\) be a working dependent variable such that \(z_{i}=\hat{\eta_{i}}+(y_{i}-\hat{\mu_{i}})\frac{d\eta_{i}}{d\mu_{i}}\),

where \(\frac{d\eta_{i}}{d\mu_{i}}\) is the derivative of the link function evaluated at the trial estimate.

Calculate the iterative weights: \(w_{i}=\frac{p_{i}}{[b^{\prime\prime}(\theta_{i})\frac{d\eta_{i}}{d\mu_{i}}^{2}]}\)

where \(b^{\prime\prime}\) is the second derivative of \(b(\theta_{i})\) evaluated at the trial estimate.

Assume \(a_{i}(\phi)\) is of the form \(\frac{\phi}{p_{i}}\). The weight \(w_{i}\) is inversely proportional to the variance of the working dependent variable \(z_{i}\) for current parameter estimates and proportionality factor \(\phi\).

Regress \(z_{i}\) on the predictors \(x_{i}\) using the weights \(w_{i}\) to obtain new estimates of \(\beta\).

\(\hat{\beta}=(\mathbf{X}^{\prime}\mathbf{W}\mathbf{X})^{-1}\mathbf{X}^{\prime}\mathbf{W}\mathbf{z}\)

where \(\mathbf{X}\) is the model matrix, \(\mathbf{W}\) is a diagonal matrix of \(w_{i}\), and \(\mathbf{z}\) is a vector of the working response variable \(z_{i}\).

This process is repeated until the estimates \(\hat{\beta}\) change by less than the specified amount.

Cost of computation

H2O can process large data sets because it relies on parallel processes. Large data sets are divided into smaller data sets and processed simultaneously and the results are communicated between computers as needed throughout the process.

In GLM, data are split by rows but not by columns, because the predicted Y values depend on information in each of the predictor variable vectors. If O is a complexity function, N is the number of observations (or rows), and P is the number of predictors (or columns) then

\(Runtime \propto p^3+\frac{(N*p^2)}{CPUs}\)

Distribution reduces the time it takes an algorithm to process because it decreases N.

Relative to P, the larger that (N/CPUs) becomes, the more trivial p becomes to the overall computational cost. However, when p is greater than (N/CPUs), O is dominated by p.

  \(Complexity = O(p^3 + N*p^2)\)

For more information about how GLM works, refer to the Generalized Linear Modeling booklet.

References¶

Breslow, N E. “Generalized Linear Models: Checking Assumptions and Strengthening Conclusions.” Statistica Applicata 8 (1996): 23-41.

Frome, E L. “The Analysis of Rates Using Poisson Regression Models.” Biometrics (1983): 665-674.

Goldberger, Arthur S. “Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in the Generalized Linear Regression Model.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57.298 (1962): 369-375.

Guisan, Antoine, Thomas C Edwards Jr, and Trevor Hastie. “Generalized Linear and Generalized Additive Models in Studies of Species Distributions: Setting the Scene.” Ecological modeling 157.2 (2002): 89-100.

Nelder, John A, and Robert WM Wedderburn. “Generalized Linear Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) (1972): 370-384.

Niu, Feng, et al. “Hogwild!: A lock-free approach to parallelizing stochastic gradient descent.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24 (2011): 693-701.*implemented algorithm on p.5

Pearce, Jennie, and Simon Ferrier. “Evaluating the Predictive Performance of Habitat Models Developed Using Logistic Regression.” Ecological modeling 133.3 (2000): 225-245.

Press, S James, and Sandra Wilson. “Choosing Between Logistic Regression and Discriminant Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 73.364 (April, 2012): 699–705.

Snee, Ronald D. “Validation of Regression Models: Methods and Examples.” Technometrics 19.4 (1977): 415-428.